Amtrak Delays Rail Study Results Ohio Needs for Federal HSR Funding

Amtrak Delays Rail Study Results Ohio Needs for Federal HSR Funding

Ohio's 3C Rail Route Missing on Midwest High Speed Rail Association Midwest Hub Map

by John Michael Spinelli

August 15, 2009

COLUMBUS, OHIO: The highly awaited Amtrak study on ridership, revenue projections and station locations related to reestablishing passenger rail service between Cincinnati and Cleveland, Ohio that was supposed to be completed mid August has been delayed a month, according to a report by the Associated Press published Friday in Forbes.com. The delay will significantly compact the time Ohio officials backing this project on the eastern fringe of the Midwestern Rail Corridor have to apply for stimulus package funding for high speed rail from the Federal Railroad Administration under the administration of President Barack Obama.

The AP's Matt Leingang reported that Amtrak has put other studies of other rail lines in other states, for example the line between Billings and Missoula , Montana, ahead of the proposed $1.53 billion route Ohio transportation and rail backers say will reconnect after 42 years of no passenger train traffic Cincinnati and Cleveland via Dayton and Columbus. This approximately 250 mile route is known as the 3C passenger rail corridor. The long awaited study, as state rail officials know, is key to Ohio's application, due on October 2, for as much as $400 million in start-up funding to get passenger trains running diagonally across the state. The plan, justified with nothing but cost estimates so far, is merely a down payment on far more costly plan that has miles to travel and many obstacles to overcome before anyone can really take it seriously, despite claims of its many benefits.

Not surprisingly, state rail officials like Matt Dietrich, executive director of the Ohio Rail Development Commission, downplayed the reported delay. But when news like this is not good, downplaying it is the only option available to a state official who has been unable to say with confidence that the need for these passenger trains and therefore the ridership that will ride them is clear and obvious. "There's a lot to do and I'm very confident we're going to get it done," Dietrich told Leingang. The $400 million figure, now a $150 higher than the figure Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland and Dietrich had been telling the press and state legislators over many months without any challenges, is supposed to go to buy rail cars, build stations and make necessary upgrades on existing freight tracks so that passenger trains traveling up to 79 mph can start running in 2011.

One common reason state officials are pushing for an idea that many Ohioans think is a giant boondoggle that will tax all Ohioans for the benefit of a few by building a train system that will be slow, costly, environmentally unfriendly and will do very little to reduce road congestion is that Ohio is home to one of the most densely populated corridors without rail service in the Midwest. But that's nothing new. So what's different today than decades ago is still unclear.

One of the many big problems with the passenger rail project being pushed by Gov. Strickland and Dietrich is that it is not high speed at all. The fact is that carbon-emitting diesel locomotives will only average 57-mph because by necessity it will have to share freight rail tracks owned by CSX and Norfolk Norther, who need more freight tracks to keep up with freight rail demands and sharing existing freight tracks with passenger trains will be problematic and lead to collisions between the different purposed trains. True high speed trains, like the ones Americans see running in Europe, Japan or China, have specially built and dedicated tracks. The faster a train goes, the straighter the route must be and the more it must be obstacle free, which means crossing traffic must either go over or below these purpose-driven tracks. All these special considerations add to the high cost of real high speed trains. Costs per mile often exceed $100 million per mile, not including on-going maintenance and operational costs.

Ohio rail rooters also say that passenger rail stations or stops will become nodes for economic development. That argument can be used with any transportation node. But if that is true, then why do they refuse to ask those businesses to be part of the funding solution?

As Ohio battles its budget shortfalls, which this cycle were $3.2 billion, and as revenue projects continue to fall short, as they came in recently with respect to gaming dollars from Keno, the funds for the state's share of the 3C just are there, no matter how many stones officials say they are looking under. State officials have been wrong on a number of revenue projections, so it's reasonable to think they could be "downplaying" the public subsidy their system would need on going, which today they say is a mere $10 million a year. And the source of those funds? Dietrich and others are looking to usurp fees that restaurants, hotels and gas stations pay to advertise on blue highway exit signs. Strickland did something similar when he tried to take hundreds of millions of tobacco settlement money earmarked for programs to stop children from smoking to help plug the hole in this year's budget.

As Leingang pointed out, Ohio has studied the idea of restoring passenger service over the past 30 years, a factor that should beg even one reporter to ask why so much time has passed and why so many funds have been spent with nothing to show for it all. The AP article quotes Ken Prendergast , executive director of All Aboard Ohio, a nonprofit group promoting passenger rail, saying that all this lost time and squandered money on studies that have produced nothing helps Ohio in its application. "We know a lot about this route already,"Prendergast said in the article, implying Ohio "is more than capable of pre-writing the application and filling in the blanks once they get new data."

But another article authored by Elana Schor of DC.Streetsblog.org about the Midwest High-Speed Rail Association's work pushing for a high-speed rail network that would use Chicago as a hub and ultimately extend through eight states, shows that the 3C route doesn't even show up on the MHSRA's rail map. One has to wonder why Ohio officials are so gungho when their prized route isn't even on the map.

But as other voices rise to raise questions rail boosters can't answer in detail or in general, about the exorbitant cost of true high speed rail, who's going to pay for it and where those funds will come from, its clear that taxpayers and others concerned about the environment, road congestion and carbon emissions are not ready to roll over for a pig in a poke.

Photo of Midwestern High Speed Rail Hub courtesy of TrainWeb.org

John Michael Spinelli is a Certified Economic Development Financing Professional, business and travel writer and former credentialed Ohio Statehouse political reporter. He is registered to lobby in Ohio and is the Director of Ohio Operations for Tubular Rail Inc. Spinelli on Assignment is syndicated by Newstex.com and is available for subscription (99 cents/month) to Kindle owners. His tweets on Twitter can be followed @OhioNewsBureau. To send a news tip or to make a comment, email him at: ohionewsbureau@gmail.com