Time Right to Make Ohio General Assembly Part-Timers

Time Right to Make Ohio General Assembly Part-Timers

Elected Officials Should Help Bear Brunt of Balancing Budget

by John Michael Spinelli

July 7, 2009

COLUMBUS, OHIO: While Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland arm-wrestles with Senate Republicans over what combination of hurtful spending cuts or wild-card revenue generators can deliver a two-year balanced budget, one big, blatant expenditure category that could produce real savings is the sacred cow of converting the Ohio General Assembly from one of the longest sessions in the nation to a part-time avocation that could net tens of millions in cost avoidance.

As each day goes by without an agreed-upon two-year budget after July 1, the start of the new fiscal year as required by the Ohio Constitution , the meltdown in cooperation between the executive and legislative branch over what cuts in spending or proposals for new revenue will win the day will only exacerbate the already fiery contest of political wills and agendas Democrats and Republicans are now engaged in.

Current solutions to patch the projected $3.2 billion budget hole include a combination of harmful measures that either weaken the social safety net millions of Ohioans who have lost jobs of late now depend on or undercut the state's investment in education or rely upon the wishful thinking wild-card that bringing new gambling devices and operations to a state that has said no to them four times previously will be a partial revenue White Knight.

Reflecting on the menu of statewide constitutional reform issues brought to a statewide vote in 2005 by progressive groups and labor unions who thought Ohioans would approve them in response to a string of government scandals tied to Republican officeholders and their loyalists, many of whom were judged guilty by a court of law of unethical or corrupt activities, one reform item that should have been included but wasn't should have been to limit the term of the Ohio General Assembly.

While the five reform amendments went down in flames, some by staggering proportions, giving Ohio voters a chance to change how long politicians stay in Columbus, site of the Statehouse, may have been the one that could have passed had it been included. Playing on the general right-of-center gut belief that the longer elected officials are allowed to be professional politicians, the more special interest lobbyists will be able to buy laws that favor their agendas even though the public at large may be the victim of that legislation, it seems the time is right to revisit the issue of converting the virtual year long session of the legislature into a shorter, defined term that will force elected officials to prioritize and address the key issues of the day. If other states can do it, so can Ohio.

But the will of the people must be brought to bear for this to happen. That will, it seems, is no where in site despite the constant carping, bickering about government and taxes and the general contempt Ohio voters have for public officials other than the ones they vote for.

Where are the TeaBaggers and the fiscal conservatives , who generally wave their American flags and spout platitudes about the benefits of small government but who have been asleep at the switch of limiting the time their legislators can boost their pay and pension contributions, the two reasons why professional politicians will fight to stay in office.

It should come as no surprise, therefore, that Ohio legislators who are term limited to eight years in one chamber or the other are always looking for a chance to extend their terms to maybe a dozen or even more years. Their argument has been that voters can term limit any candidate by unseating them in the voting booth and that so-called "institutional knowledge," the intangible wisdom that comes from being in office for decades as was the case before term limits were approved in the early 1990s, would deliver good government because the experience accumulated over time would accrue to a legislator's understanding of various issues, giving them the perspective and wisdom to make good decisions.

Of the nation's 50 states, Ohio has long ranked as one of the top states with full-time legislatures. The cost to Ohio taxpayers, vis a vis the General Revenue Fund, for running the General Assembly, both the Ohio House and Senate, is not insignificant.

According to most recent FY 2010-2011 Redbook analysis of the executive budget proposal for each agency prepared by the Legislative Service Commission, total funding for the Ohio House of Representatives, comprised of its 99 members, 165 full-time staff and 40 pages, is $20.6 million a year or $41.2 for the biennium.

For the Ohio Senate, with its 33 members, 125 full-time staff and 40 part-time pages, total funding amounts to $12.6 million or $25.2 for the biennium.

Therefore, the combined total of our full-time professional legislature for two years is $66.4 million.

For a state whose residents historically have decried government at all levels as being too big, too costly, too intrusive in personal affairs or an obstacle to business development, it is curiously ironic that those who complain the loudest are suddenly silent to clipping the wings of the very people they charge with either playing politics or for partisan advantage or working in opposition to the what's best for the public interest.

Amid the the flame throwing over whether taxes should be increased or more cuts to government should be made, one cut that could achieve the dual goals of reducing the cost of government and forcing lawmakers to address the key issues of the day would be to send elected officials to Columbus for a limited period, to do the public's business on the key issues of the day. Afterward, they can go back home, where they can work on family or personal business without tax payers footing the bill.

But such a sane, common sense proposition seems a bridge to far for Ohioans, who will suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous politicians acting outrageously at a time when outrageous behavior is not their calling.

John Michael Spinelli is a Certified Economic Development Financing Professional, business and travel writer and former credentialed Ohio Statehouse political reporter. He is registered to lobby in Ohio and is the Director of Ohio Operations for Tubular Rail Inc. Spinelli on Assignment is syndicated by Newstex.com, can be followed on Twitter @OhioNewsBureau and available for subscription to Kindle owners. To send a news tip or make comment, email ohionewsbureau@gmail.com

Obama, Biden Inoculate Against "Washingtonitis"

Obama, Biden Inoculate Against "Washingtonitis"

Strickland, Govs Ask for Help

OhioNewsBureau

with John Michael Spinelli

Columbus, Ohio: With nearly a month passing since the 2008 Democratic ticket was elected to bring change to the White House and still another six weeks to go until they are sworn in as President and Vice President, President-elect Barack Obama and Vice-President-elect JoeBiden told a national meeting of governors in Philadelphia, PA, today that fresh thinking and ideas that work will both have their ears and inoculate their administration from the kind of ideological group-think that leads to an insularity of thinking they dubbed "Washingtonitis."

Noting that 41 states face budget shortfalls, made more egregious by constitutions that mandate a balanced budget, Obama said Washington under his leadership will act swiftly to pass an economic recovery plan that will help Wall Street and Main Street pull out of the economic dire straights bearing down on the nation.

Reiterating again what he so often said on the campaign trail, Obama said his recovery plan will include needed middle-class tax cuts along with "down payments on critical investments" like infrastructure projects that can sustain long-term growth and "pull us out of our current economic slump."

He said change needs to come not just from Washington, but from everyone, including members of the loyal opposition, who he extended a hand of friendship to and said would have his ear if their ideas are good and workable.

"Show me what works and you'll have my ear," he told the assembled governors, most of whom are fighting imploding budgets, job losses, home foreclosures and a general malaise that has sapped spirits as they watch their stocks and retirement funds erase gains made over the last decade. He said he and his running mate would not be "hampered by ideology" as they seek a plan for recovery.

He told the governors that he not only expects them to implement programs emanating from Washington, but to "help draft and shape them" too, then spend funds well.

Obama said there will be "hard choices about how to invest tax dollars" that may not always be popular, but everyone working together, a strategy he said had been important and effective in his own career, would prevent him and his administration from being infected with "Washingtonitis" or the inability to see the world from a perspective other than from within a small group of advisers.

Noting who his audience was, Obama quoted Supreme Court Judge Brandeis, saying that states can be laboratories to test out what works and what doesn't so Washington can observe and act accordingly.

Among the governors in Philadelphia today was Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland, who yesterday said state finances are worsening and told Ohioans that more budget cuts are coming, which could mean reduced funding or program services for his constituents.

Vice President-elect Joe Biden, a long-standing rider of the rails, said America needs to up its investment in infrastructure, now a dismal 1 percent of GDP, to levels approaching those of China, where levels of 7 percent of GDP are common.

Joe the rail passenger pointed to the China Olympics as an example of the value of funding infrastructure, making special note of theMagLev rail line that whisks passengers along at speeds of 200-miles-per-hour or more.

In his letter to the two future leaders of the nation, Ohio Gov. Strickland asked for a financial package composed of state block grants and help for needy families among other concerns.

For purely political reasons, Strickland has refused to mouth the words "increased taxes" for fear Republicans will use it to defeat him in 2010 as just another liberal, tax and spend Democrat who says one thing and does another. By refusing so far to consider tax increases, Strickland has neutered Republicans who desperately want to tag him as a tax raiser.

When Republicans controlled state government from the governor's mansion to both chambers of the legislature for nearly 16 years, they passed a five-year tax reduction program in 2005 that has reduced revenue to state coffers at a time when those revenues are needed. Republican leaders at the time said Ohio's tax plan would be the envy of the nation.

John Michael Spinelli is a former Ohio Statehouse government and political reporter and business columnist. To send a tip of comment, email ohionewsbureau@gmail.com